지금은 평가중

Evaluation What? & How?

(Ⅱ. What questions will we ask? What exercise will we do? Ⅲ. Who will we ask? Ⅳ. Where will we ask?)

1.    IPM readiness (4 categories)

A.     Community Expectation and Perceptions of WV

①     Suggested Tool: Perceptions Exercise from IPM

B.      Partner Analysis

①     Are there partners out there?

                                  i.         What kinds of formal, informal groups in there? Other NGOs, Local churches, state agencies

②     Capability

                                  i.         Resources, Motivation & Vision, Technical Expertise, Connected to others

③     Which ones does WV work with?

                                  i.         Quality of the relationship. 월드비전이 파트너들과 일을 하면서 어떤 관계를 맺어왔는지. 보스와 부하직원처럼 관계했는지, 동등한 파트너로써 일을 했는지 등을 알아볼 수 있다.

C.      Community analysis

①     Level of Empowerment – How active they are, confident

②     Level of Trust - cooperation, 주민들이 서로 믿고 협력하려 하는지

③     Level of Volunteerism - Help each other

④     Level of Connectedness (type of social networks) - Are there groups isolated from any groups? Isolated groups

                                  i.         Individualism 완전혼자

                                 ii.         Isolated but linked with outside community 이민자들, 지방에서 수도로 올라온 사람들,

                                iii.         Strong group - not connected in each groups 같은 지역 내에서 자기들 그룹끼리 노는 것

                                iv.         Strong group - Highly connected each other 같은 지역 내에서 자기들 그룹도 있고 각 그룹끼리도 활발히 교류가 이루어짐

D.     Staff preparation

①     Technique: Self-Assessment Tool

②     Dimensions: 1. knowledge of IPM Theory, 2. Skills required for IPM Practice

2.    Impact

A.     Quality of programming

①     Staff quality – relationship with Community

②     Quality of materials, knowledge, training

B.      Achievement of Outcome goals - using MSC

We will ask all of these questions to the beneficiaries who are involved in this project

①     Health

                                  i.         MCH

                                 ii.         Access Health

②     Education

                                  i.         Child protect

                                 ii.         Education quality

                                iii.         participating

③     Child well being

④     Economic Development

                                  i.         Household income

                                 ii.         business #’s

⑤     Sponsorship

                                  i.         RCs lives impact

⑥     Human Development – Civil Society

                                  i.         capacity building other organizations

⑦     Unintended consequences

C.      Evaluator Questions – Design document versus log-frame

D.     Big Picture Questions

①     Most Vulnerable community included, involved and impacted?

②     Future interests/needs directions

3.    Sustainability and Participation – 5 Dimensions of analysis + checklist

A.     What is the level of stakeholder participation?

B.      Where are the resources coming from?

①     All WV

②     WV + Government

③     WV + Government + other groups

④     WV + Government + other groups + individuals

C.      Diversity of stakeholders

①     Fairly homogenous

②     Some diversity

③     Very diverse

D.     Most Vulnerable Involved?

①     Not involved and not targeted

②     Someone targeted and somewhat involved

③     Very targeted and very involved

E.      Good Fit for context?

①     Little interest or excitement by local stakeholders

②     Some interest or excitement by local stakeholders

③     Considerable interest or excitement by local stakeholders

 

Matrix of information TUV 작성

 

Which place and Schedule

 

Who is doing the work?

대상 Soum을 정한 후, 솜 별로 'Facilitator 1명, 기록자 2명'으로 나누고 평가 가능한 관계자들을 선정. 대상별로 KII or GFD 결정. (구체적인 대상설정 eg. KII일 경우 대상 이름까지) 평가대상 시간설정 + Target Objective 설정

재미있을지는 모르겠지만 일단 적어놓기.